Print and Album competition was interesting to say the least. There were over 2200 entries in the competition. We all know that digital photography has impacted the photography industry in positive ways. However, we are also seeing some negative impacts as well. There is such a huge difference between good photographers and extraordinary ones. I think that is why it is becoming so popular for affluent couples to import their photographers for their wedding.
Some couples can see the distinction and have to have it. Others, miss out because they don't know any better. And, it seems that photography is sometimes low on the budget list before the wedding sometimes only to become the most important aspect after the wedding. Engaged couples should really take this to heart. Even many party planners and event designers are clueless as to the importance of photography and often under budget. A good rule of thumb is to budget at least 10% of the total budget on photography.
Extraordinary talent is so few and far between. The truth is that this level of talent is so hard to come by that it is like finding a needle in a haystack. There may be just a few artists in your major markets, a handful scattered around the country in remote areas, and then it goes overseas.
We travel globally for events quite often, and when you watch every image come through an International competition like this, you start to see and understand why affluent couples seek out extraordinary talents. The difference in what we saw was simple. Too many photographers aren't taking the time to learn the qualities of light. They are looking at the back of their digital camera and seeing a well exposed image, but that is it. Extraordinary images have more than perfect exposure. They have impeccable lighting. They have been captured and printed by a designer artist that has impeccable taste. They have been mastered in Photoshop to have maximum visual appeal and the results of this blend of talent are remarkable.
As the head judge for the album competition, the only thing I need to comment on is the lack of photojournalism and non-fiction in the album competition. There is a lot of fashion work coming through that is stunning and bold to look at. I love high fashion wedding photography as much as anyone, but, the client has to painfully know that the photographer is present to get those types of images.
Secondly, there seemed to be a lot of cliché' books or style plagerism coming through in which they lack originality and most of all reality. I am not saying they aren't off the charts beautiful to look at, I am just stating that truth, history, and realism are the core of what we feel weddings are about because they are timeless qualities. It is important to remember that we must evolve beyond these looks. Points were being taken off for lack of originality.
Photographers copying these high fashion styles should be careful. Fashion is easily dated, so these albums will probably look dated in just a few short years. I don't think anyone wants to look at their album in 2020 and say to themselves "that was sooo 2007". I think they want to see a timeless quality that remains classic and classy.
So, as a print chair and a print judge, the conclusion is that stars really shined bright. But the difference between 98% and the 2% that were remarkable was apparent and dramatic.